Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 244

Thread: HV30 announced (and other new developments in the world of [moving] picture taking)

  1. #51
    Administrator Lunchbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, USA
    Posts
    9,156

    Default

    Sorry to be a party pooper. If HV30 is out available now in B&H, I will order one in a heart beat just for the 30P recording mode. I wish there're more features (LANC, better looking body like the HG10).

    I think for those who doesn't own a HV20, buying HV30 might not be bad. For those who already own HV20, no need to upgrade.

    I plan to get a second HV20, so I will go for HV30

  2. #52
    Moderator Eugenia Loli-Queru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bay Area, CA, USA
    Posts
    5,270

    Default

    Mal, I see, I misunderstood, sorry. I thought you didn't care about the product.

    Taky, if you don't own an HV20, sure, go for the HV30, but overall the product is not a huge improvement. Besides, we can't be sure that their 30p recording is without a need of pulldown removal or other weird processing that Canon did in order to be able to record on tape, and in that case there is no known utility that will perform that.
    Last edited by Eugenia Loli-Queru; 2008 January 7th at 17:25.

  3. #53
    Sherminator Dodgy Nick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    London, UK (expat South African)
    Posts
    841

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bluegrass View Post
    spoiler - you left out the removal of a zero in the name on the dual.
    See point number 2 in my post.

    Quote Originally Posted by bluegrass View Post
    although sono2c might like the real answer which is the 100 has no built in flash to capture to, where the 10 does and than gives you the option of adding a memory chip in addition to the builit in 16 gig flash memory.
    See point number 1 in my post. Granted, maybe I was a little too concise, so you've expanded on it nicely, and for that, I thank you. I'm actually quite looking forward to play with the HF10. I hope I don't like it. Can't afford to spend more money on this hobby at this minute!

  4. #54
    Troublemaker Mal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,965

    Default

    No worries, Eugenia, just thought I'd clear that up.

    HV30's 30p pulldown removal: on the other hand, we also don't know if Canon finally put in proper flags in the HV30 for 24p and 30p? Right? Any info on that?

  5. #55
    Administrator Lunchbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, USA
    Posts
    9,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mal View Post
    No worries, Eugenia, just thought I'd clear that up.

    HV30's 30p pulldown removal: on the other hand, we also don't know if Canon finally put in proper flags in the HV30 for 24p and 30p? Right? Any info on that?
    Why do I need to remove pulldown from 30P video?

  6. #56
    Moderator Eugenia Loli-Queru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bay Area, CA, USA
    Posts
    5,270

    Default

    I am not saying you do for sure, but given the fact that HDV doesn't have such provisions, Canon might have invented something weird again to stay compatible like in the PF24 case. Besides, 1080/60i can give you a perfect 1080/30p with a good de-interlacer, the only thing that's different is the lower shutter speeds.

  7. #57
    Moderator koolpenguin89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,094

    Default

    taky, what did u mean by the hv30 at b+h?

  8. #58
    Moderator bluegrass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    St.Louis, Missouri
    Posts
    2,012

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eugenia Loli-Queru View Post
    The new AVCHD line of cameras use a 1/3.2 sensor, which means LESS BACKGROUND BLUR than HV20/HV30's 1/2.7. I would personally not go near them just because of that. And their filter thread is down to 37mm too.
    than how about a 16 gig flash drive that is capable of emulating a mindv cassette with 50meg transfer rate we can shove in our 20s. but maybe it will have to go into the minidv slot like we use to plug our portable DVDs into our car cassette player.

    you mean 6mm is a big deal?

    are you saying avchd should be killed before it even got started?

    i thought you only got background blur with a 35mm adaptor.

  9. #59
    Sherminator Dodgy Nick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    London, UK (expat South African)
    Posts
    841

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koolpenguin89 View Post
    taky, what did u mean by the hv30 at b+h?
    I think Taky was speaking hypothetically. like usual.

  10. #60
    Troublemaker Mal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,965

    Default

    Well, like Eugenia said: how is that 30p wrapped in the 60i? Is a simple matter, or will there be NLEs which have difficulties recognizing it properly?

    If the HV30 adds better 24p usability, and simple 30p, it will be a big plus.

  11. #61
    Forum Mogul nolonemo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Los Freaking Angeles
    Posts
    745

    Default

    Well, look on the bright side. At least Canon didn't go backwards, like Panasonic did when they followed the GS400 with the GS500....

  12. #62
    Administrator Lunchbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, USA
    Posts
    9,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpoilerWarning View Post
    I think Taky was speaking hypothetically. like usual.
    Oh yeah.. MIA for a few months now come back for personal attack!

    hehe

  13. #63
    Administrator Lunchbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, USA
    Posts
    9,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koolpenguin89 View Post
    taky, what did u mean by the hv30 at b+h?
    I mean IF it's available at B&H, I will buy one from them.

  14. #64
    Senior Member ForwardLooker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mal View Post
    There's NO real info on it at all.
    The RED personnel put out a teaser on their forum, as a means of diverting attention away from someone complaining about poor quality issues on a delivered RED ONE.
    what poor quality issues did they refer too?? was it just 1 individual case?

  15. #65
    Troublemaker Mal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,965

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ForwardLooker View Post
    what poor quality issues did they refer too?? was it just 1 individual case?
    Not sure if you're a reservation holder of RED or not, but anyone higher than, say 700, should be fine.

    It's new company with a new and very complicated product.
    Since they don't have the time nor funds nor capacity to properly test the cam, I'd say the first few hundred cams' owners are BETA testers. Things can go wrong, and they did. Not all features are enabled. Once they get enabled, they will probably go wrong too, until they get sorted out.
    The particular cam I was referring to suffered from VERY POOR Quality Control. RED swiftly came back and blamed the Christmas holiday staff, that "pushed the product out too fast, and it won't happen again" (paraphrasing).

    From about mid-year, and from about serial number 700 things should be SWEET!

  16. #66
    Legend Ian-T's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,633

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nolonemo View Post
    Well, look on the bright side. At least Canon didn't go backwards, like Panasonic did when they followed the GS400 with the GS500....
    This is what I was speculating all alog. But you are corect...at least they did not go backwards.

  17. #67
    Moderator koolpenguin89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,094

    Default

    thanks taky, your phrasing threw me off earlier

  18. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eugenia Loli-Queru View Post
    I am officially pissed off at Canon. Dumbed down AVCHD cameras regarding their CMOS sensor size and filter thread, and the HV30 is actually a joke. I had to blog about it and let my feelings out: http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/0...ou-screwed-up/

    There is no way I am upgrading my gear. If Canon can't get it right, I think I will wait for the RED pocket camera if it's in the region of $3000.

    XHA1?

    It's a very very capable camera that can make incredible images.

    Some grabs of A1 with 35mm adapter

  19. #69
    Moderator Eugenia Loli-Queru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bay Area, CA, USA
    Posts
    5,270

    Default

    Thing is, I want a small-ish movie-look camera, and no adapters (which will mean a better included lens and a BIG sensor). I need the camera to be "made" for that specific indie filmmaking market rather than having myself trying to tweak it later...

  20. #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    355

    Default

    Cool...

    The XHA1 is much bigger.

    I find it comfortable but I wonder if a great cam in between HV20 and XHA1 size would fit the bill?

  21. #71
    Administrator Lunchbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, USA
    Posts
    9,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koolpenguin89 View Post
    thanks taky, your phrasing threw me off earlier
    What do you mean by that?

  22. #72
    Administrator Lunchbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, USA
    Posts
    9,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ESTEBEVERDE View Post
    I find it comfortable but I wonder if a great cam in between HV20 and XHA1 size would fit the bill?
    Yeah "HV30 + WA lens adapter + lens hood + videoMic + video lights" will

  23. #73
    Valued Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    84

    Default

    I just got an e-mail from Canon announcing the new line of camcorders. Like others here, first thing I did was compare the new features of the HV30 with my HV20. I agree that its not a huge improvement - but I don't understand why that should tick-off HV20 owners. We've got a great camera that it's hard for Canon to improve upon. 30p is the only real difference I noticed, but its certainly not worth upgrading. If I was in the market today, I'd probably even go with the HV20 because of the price. I'm glad that it has the same look and accessory compatibility - a major change would have devalued our HV20's.

  24. #74
    Administrator Lunchbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, USA
    Posts
    9,156

    Default

    I don't know how good it looks of the silver Canon WD-H43 WA lens on a black HV30.

  25. #75
    Sherminator Dodgy Nick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    London, UK (expat South African)
    Posts
    841

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taky View Post
    I don't know how good it looks of the silver Canon WD-H43 WA lens on a black HV30.
    you can always spraypant your lens! I remember when the HV20 came out some crazy kid said he was going to spray his black. I bet he's kicking himself now if he did it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •