Ok so i dropped my tamron 17-50 vc 2.8 lens, need another one but wait, should i get the canon 17-55mm 2.8 or the sigma 17-50 2.8, all lens decent but i also want the lens for photos as well as video. by all readings the 17-55mm 2.8 for my canon 60d is sharp as a L lens, but ken rockwell says its only just sharper than the kit lens and only upgrade if got money to burn!!!
So my 100mm f2 canon briliant, my 50mm 1.8 ace, my 30mm 1.4 sigma ace, and now needed the 17-55 end or ?? Or would the 24-70 L Lens for full frame be better not that im going full frame, is it better glass? not sure if that has stabilization? Also has anyone got the sigma 70-200 2.8 or the 70-200 canon 2,8? would i benefit buying one of those also or just stick with the 100mm which is long enough on a crop sensor.. Are there any better lens out there??