Page 24 of 24 FirstFirst ... 14222324
Results 576 to 577 of 577

Thread: 24p/24fps vs 60/60fps etc...

  1. #576
    Senior Member EvilBastardProductions's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TiE_Shepherd View Post
    I wonder how much of this is actually due to the frame rate....

    "While 48fps may create a more realistic, "you are there" picture quality, it actually works against The Hobbit from the 10 minutes of footage we saw. This undeniable "reality" kept pulling me out of the movie rather than immersing me fully into its world as the Lord of the Rings films did; the very fantasy element, the artifice of it all (whether it's the wigs, fake beards or CG monsters) was plainly, at times painfully, evident. There was none of the painterly gentleness that film offers a fantasy film, as was so beautifully the case with the original (shot on film) LOTR trilogy. I fully expect the 48fps issue to become the much-talked about "mumbling Bane" flap to come out of CinemaCon."
    the 24fps trailer they supplied had the same problems. The whole thing, and even the people in it, all just looked obviously fake.
    Evil Bastard Productions
    http://www.evilbastardproductions.com

  2. #577
    Travelling MAL 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,609

    Default

    It looks the same as the others to me, but I didn't really like them, so...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •