-
2010 August 17th, 15:26
#1
Music Man
HV40 + Raynox 6600 : Fit in what bag?
Hi,
2 questions really.
1) Is it safe to leave a Raynox 6600 attached to an HV40 when in the bag and transporting it?
2) Can you recommend an inexpensive bag that will hold both comfortably and safely?
Thank you!
-
2010 August 17th, 18:09
#2
Legend
Remember that the threads on the HV40 are plastic, so
1 - it's wise not to thread/unthread too often
2 - it's unwise to bump the lens while attached, might break the threads...
-
2010 August 17th, 18:20
#3
Music Man
That seems to make it essential then to have a great case that can hold both when it's attacked.
Might be to buy an aluminum brief case off eBay and then DIY the foam to hold all in place.
-
2010 August 17th, 20:15
#4
Senior Member
Planning on purchasing a Raynox 6600 WA lens very soon, along with an XH-A1 lens hood. Steve_Karl, do you have a lens hood on your Raynox? If so, do you have a cap of somekind to protect the lens while in transport, since the automatic lens cover on the camera itself is of no use with a WA lens attached.
Also interested in seeing what you decide on for a case/bag for your setup. Need to starting looking at that myself. Good luck!
-
2010 August 17th, 20:20
#5
Music Man
Hi jakenbocker,
I haven't yet purchased a WA. I was just thinking ahead trying to plan.
I did just find a nice aluminum case on eBay but it will take some DIY to fill it with foam etc.
It's the deepest one I could find at 5".
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=STRK:MEWAX:IT
-
2010 August 18th, 02:18
#6
Legend
If you're going to keep the WA on all the time, get Canon's adapter, not a Raynox.
You can zoom all the way with Canon, but Raynox gets fuzzy past the halfway point or so - I've been told...
-
2010 August 19th, 12:44
#7
Music Man
Janke: Understood. I wasn't aware of the Raynox zoom fuzz until now.
There are reports of the Raynox 6600 pro 52mm having less distortion than the Canon WD-H43. I think that would be my biggest worry with getting the Canon.
So what if I leave my B&W clear protection filter on the front of the HV40 and screw / unscrew the Raynox any time I like? That would keep the Canon threads safe.
Do you think there will be a problem with having the extra distance or glass between the hv40 and the Raynox?
Thanks,
-
2010 August 19th, 15:33
#8
Legend
The difference in distortion is much less than the difference in zooming ability. I'd get the Canon - it's specially designed for the HV.
I've tested the Canon (not on architecture, mind you), and the quality was excellent.
-
2010 August 19th, 16:03
#9
I had the HV with the Raynox and I just left the 43>52 step-up ring on the camera at all times....no wear-and-tear on the camera's threads.
@jakenbocker, the Raynox comes with a lens cap.
-
2010 August 19th, 18:06
#10
Music Man
Ahhhh ... excellent idea with leaving the step-up ring on ... and the bonus cap is cool!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules