Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Weird artifacts - DIY adapter

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    3

    Question Weird artifacts - DIY adapter

    Hi everyone

    I've built dof adapter (static), using Canon EE-S focusing screen. Raynox DCR-250 works as a macro, im using m42 lenses. Everything would be nice, but im getting some weird stripes and patterns on screen (please ignore vignetting and dirt on GG).

    I've uploaded some samples with description of settings here:
    www.qmite.com/problem/pics.html (click pictures for full res versions).

    I know that on higher aperatures Canon EE-S tend to show its microlens structure, but im getting it even on f/2.0. Theres actually 2 types of artifacts:

    One (seen on pics. 1-18) is dependent on aperature (its visible even at f/2.0 tho), and can be reduced by rotating focusing screen by some angle. At some point they are almost invisible (pics. 15, 18) but if you look closely You'll find them. Other way I discovered is unzooming camera a bit - having borders which i need to crop (and loose some resolution...), but they ALMOST dissapear. Third way is to defocus camera a bit.. but it looses to much sharpness (pics. 10,11).

    Second pattern (horizontal lines) is visible when lens is out of focus, at every aperature even 2.0. And its not really dependent on zooming camera or rotating focusing screen (pics. 19-23 and 32-35).

    I thought it may be raynox, but i can see this patterns (at least second type) even with bare eyes (without raynox/camera). I tried to change lenght of whole adapter (distance from hv20 to gg), it changes lines but they never dissapear completly.

    Could it be that I've damaged focusing screen while building adapter (i put it on and off like million times, sometime by force), or when I cleaned it with distilled water? I'm out of ideas... :/

    Anybody have similar problems or know the solution? I know many people use EE-S, seen lots of footage and no one seems to have problem with it.. (Twoneil's footage looks nice, and judging by his "domino effect" video he uses a lot EE-S screens;d).

    I've spend few months collecting parts, building dof adapter and rails... getting pretty good picture with it, but this artifacts makes it unusable. Help!;]

  2. #2

    Default

    looks like a finger print on one of the lenses. I dont know, I don't use static adapters for the dirt reasons on the gg

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    3

    Default

    I used many different lenses, and its surely not fingerprint:]

  4. #4
    Previously geeking out over 2/3" Scarlet. Scarlet-X...not so much.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    3,860

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by qmite View Post
    I used many different lenses, and its surely not fingerprint:]
    I guess it's some kind of interference in the EE-S microlenses, i guess there's not much you can do about it... a vibrating adapter would probably hide those. My DIY uses EE-S too, but i've never noticed that kind of a pattern.
    *Balanced audio hack* *Variable ND filters* *HV20 vs. Film* "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." (George Orwell: Animal Farm)

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    3

    Default

    yes, i thought that first artifact could be a moire effect of hv20 sensor and gg's microlenses as it changes with rotating gg

    but second type - patterns when slr lens is defocused?.. its visible even without camera

    and i wonder why I'm the only one seeing this problems with ee-s :/

    help? anyone?

  6. #6
    Leg-end um3k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Akron, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    1,322

    Default

    I've seen the second artifact in my 20d viewfinder--it has to do with the pattern of the groundglass. Unlike an actual piece of glass which has been ground, these SLR GGs have a specific pattern to them, and are etched with a laser. The pattern is designed to give the best overall brightness, but it makes the bokeh less natural and gives this sort of repeating line artifact.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •