Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Hv20 footage looks soft (out of focus) in editing system but fine on tape.

  1. #1

    Default Hv20 footage looks soft (out of focus) in editing system but fine on tape.

    Hello everyone i am a new member but have been coming here to read posts for a while now. I appreciate you all.

    Issue:
    I shot a feature this summer using the hv20 (loved it). the footage looked great during shooting (I was the DP and often used the focus assist for my shots). However, when the footage was imported into premiere pro cs3 using the hdv preset the footage output looks soft and out of focus. I would think it was my shooting but i am a very careful when i shoot and as i mentioned, i often used focus assist. the footage still looks great when played from the camera but on the timeline and when output to an avi (uncompressed) it comes out soft and very...muddy (as to say clips such as ones shot in bright daylight which appear vibrant when layed on the camera appear like they were overcast). I am by no means new to video production, editing, or filming, and this has me perplexed. My initial thought is that it has something to do with interlacing or the capture presets but i have no idea. has anyone else experienced overly soft output? any suggestions?. thank you in advance for your responses. i will try to post a still or two so you can see what i mean but I'm pressed for time at the moment.


    Shot the entire film in 24p cinemode with the vibrant preset and footage on tape looks crisp.

  2. #2
    Legend Ian-T's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,633

    Default

    Not sure what the problem might be. I've read about this same type of issue before (in this forum) with others using Premier. Quick suggestion...try using the free application HDVSplit to capture and bring that into your NLE to see if there is a difference.
    No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life...Albert Einstein

  3. #3
    Legend SenorKaffee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    So close to the dutch border, it's hardly Germany anymore
    Posts
    1,161

    Default

    If that doesnīt work out you could also convert the video to an intermediate format. I donīt trust the MPEG2 decoder in Adobe products either.
    Studio Special Place - Amateurs built the Arc, professionals built the Titanic

  4. #4
    Super Member Kyleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    I usually use uncompressed .Mov (Quicktime) and have no problems at all. Maybe you should try that.



    -Kyle

  5. #5
    Administrator Lunchbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, USA
    Posts
    9,155

    Default

    Do you mean the footage is soft when viewing it in Premiere timeline? Or after you export it to other format in Premiere?

  6. #6
    Forum Mogul
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    500

    Default

    How do you know it looks great on tape? Have you output the camera right to a hdtv and watched the video to verify it? What looks sharp on the tiny LCD is often not in focus at all when seen on a bigger screen.

    Just wondering how you confirmed that the video on tape is actually in focus and sharp looking.

  7. #7

    Default soft in premiere and output

    Quote Originally Posted by Lunchbox View Post
    Do you mean the footage is soft when viewing it in Premiere timeline? Or after you export it to other format in Premiere?
    Well it looks fuzzy in premiere period. if i watch it from the timeline it looks soft. If i export it to an uncompressed file it still looks soft. I initially thought it was because it was un-rendered but was sorely disappointed after it was finally rendered and still looked horrible. applying a sharpening filter helps, however some of the footage daytime still looks a little dark and there is of course the risk of little loss of quality with using a sharpening filter.

  8. #8
    Valued Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    86

    Default

    How did you import the footage in Premiere ? How did you do the pulldown to get the 24p back ?

  9. #9
    Administrator Lunchbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, USA
    Posts
    9,155

    Default

    Premiere preview could be fuzzy but that's normal. It's a preview. Here's a few thing you can tell us,

    - What's your source footage (60i, 30p, PF24)
    - What timeline preset you use or you create your own preset
    - Have you upgrade to Premiere Pro 3.2
    - How did you export? What export settings (codec, frame size, frame rate, pixel aspect ratio, odd/even field or progressive)


    You can also read about this thread

    http://www.hv20.com/showthread.php?t=6075

    The fuzziess was caused by the wrong timeline preset.

  10. #10

    Default yes, watched it directly from camera on hdtv

    Quote Originally Posted by Jennzababe View Post
    How do you know it looks great on tape? Have you output the camera right to a hdtv and watched the video to verify it? What looks sharp on the tiny LCD is often not in focus at all when seen on a bigger screen.

    Just wondering how you confirmed that the video on tape is actually in focus and sharp looking.
    I know what you mean about the lcd and yes, some of the footage was viewed on an hdtv the day it was shot, kind of like viewing a daily if you will, and it came out very crisp. We didn't look at all of the footage from each day on that tv but enough to convince me that what i see out of premiere is not as good as the source footage. There were a couple of instances when we knew something was a little soft when i shot it but those clips just look even more out of focus than they are, in addition to the sharp images looking soft.

  11. #11
    Super Member Kyleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    In Premiere Preview, did you Right-Click and select "Highest Quality"? Did you know that this also effects your rendering quality, also? By a small amount.


    -Kyle

  12. #12

    Default I'll have to try this ASAP

    Quote Originally Posted by SenorKaffee View Post
    If that doesnīt work out you could also convert the video to an intermediate format. I donīt trust the MPEG2 decoder in Adobe products either.
    Thank you, and Ian-T. I was wondering if this could be an issue, i will have to try this and let you know how converting to an intermediate or using hd split may help. I'm not new to filmmaking but I am new to the hv20 and hdv in general, and am jut now starting to get a grasp of the workflow most people on this site suggest. I didn't know about these things until very recently so when i return from my trip i will see of that helps.

  13. #13

    Default More info

    Quote Originally Posted by Lunchbox View Post
    Premiere preview could be fuzzy but that's normal. It's a preview. Here's a few thing you can tell us,

    - What's your source footage (60i, 30p, PF24)
    - What timeline preset you use or you create your own preset
    - Have you upgrade to Premiere Pro 3.2
    - How did you export? What export settings (codec, frame size, frame rate, pixel aspect ratio, odd/even field or progressive)


    You can also read about this thread

    http://www.hv20.com/showthread.php?t=6075

    The fuzziess was caused by the wrong timeline preset.
    Thanks for the link.
    I shot it in pf24.
    I used the "DV 24p widescreen 48Hz" timeline preset in premiere cs3 which states:
    -For editing 23.976 fps footage shot in 24P or 24PA (24P Advanced) modes.
    -Widescreen NTSC frame aspect ratio (16:9).
    -48kHz (16 bit) audio.
    -2:3:3:2 pull-up for playback to a DV device.
    -progressive (no fields)

    I haven't yet upgraded to 3.2. and as far as export I just exported a progressive uncompressed microsoft dv avi. since i didn't import the footage myself i am wondering if it could have been the capture settings which were the default for that project preset which seemed fine to me, any comments on that?

  14. #14
    Super Member Kyleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    Are you meaning to edit in SD? Because that's an SD preset.




    -Kyle

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by franssu View Post
    How did you import the footage in Premiere ? How did you do the pulldown to get the 24p back ?
    Hmm. i just used the default capture settings from the "dv 24p widescreen 48khz" preset and that may be the issue. if you believe so, could someone possibly explain how or why? thanks to everyone for their help so far. You all are so helpful and fast too. Ha, i luv u all.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kyleman View Post
    Are you meaning to edit in SD? Because that's an SD preset.




    -Kyle
    yes we were editing SD because we knew our output would be sd. In retrospect I would have tried to edit HD and export it SD somehow later. One thing is that the director (who's editing program/computer we were using) said he had no presets in the "HDV" folder when you start a new premiere project so that is why he chose the 24p widescreen preset. i raised a brow but didnt think much of it. Would that have potentially caused the disappointing soft look though?

  17. #17
    Super Member Kyleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    Premire dosen't come with any good HDV presets. There is a 24p preset download (Official) Here.


    -Kyle

  18. #18
    Curmudgerator CycleWriter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    LaLa Land
    Posts
    6,773

    Default

    If you're editing it as SD then you'll be rendering SD to SD. You'll get better results editing HD and rendering it to SD.
    To all Newbies: Have you read this FAQ before posting? Or watched this short video?
    If you haven't, then don't complain when I close or move your thread.


    The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing. --Albert Einstein

  19. #19
    Super Member Kyleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CycleWriter View Post
    If you're editing it as SD then you'll be rendering SD to SD. You'll get better results editing HD and rendering it to SD.

    Don't listen to this man. He's crazy. But, he is right.


    -Kyle

  20. #20
    Administrator Lunchbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, USA
    Posts
    9,155

    Default

    You did everything wrong. If you shoot PF24, you will need to remove pulldown. Otherwise, your footage is 60i. Please read the FAQ

    http://hv20.com/showthread.php?t=3058

    You can also edit in HDV instead of DV 24p. You will need to upgrade to Premiere Pro 3.2 so there is a HDV 1080p24 timeline preset.

    Here's another tips and tricks for Premiere Pro you can read about

    http://hv20.com/showthread.php?t=7067

  21. #21
    Curmudgerator CycleWriter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    LaLa Land
    Posts
    6,773

    Default

    Another newbie schooled on the benefits and wisdom of reading the FAQ and Stickies and doing a search first.
    To all Newbies: Have you read this FAQ before posting? Or watched this short video?
    If you haven't, then don't complain when I close or move your thread.


    The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing. --Albert Einstein

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •