kroguk
2007 June 27th, 13:40
Hi all,
I have recently purchased an HV20 and was glad to see that there was already a forum to discuss this great camcorder.
My first impressions of the camera are very good and so far, it has exceeded my expectations.
Its first test footage (apart from a few minutes in the garden) was taken at last weekends MotoGP event at Donington Park. I was pleased to see that it handled the fast moving subjects very well and the slower footage was flawless.
At this stage I guess I should point out that I have played back the footage on a Panasonic 50" plasma (via HDMI) and it is simply crystal clear and highly detailed.
Okay, onto the thread topic ! I have imported the footage into iMovieHD on my Mac and have edited it very simply by adding some transitions between clips and also some titling. I also experimented with slowing some footage down. After finishing the edit and waiting three and a half hours for my Mac to send it back to my camera, I played back the footage to see what the results were like. For the most part they were fine. The slow-mo experiment failed...not sure why....might be an interlacing issue?!?.
However, the one thing that was very noticeable was a distinct drop in quality where transitions or titling had been added. It was almost as if the software had processed the frame affected by the transition at a lower resolution and when the frame went back to its unedited portion, it returned to its noticeably higher quality. It kinda' looked like the edited part was in DV whilst the rest was obviously still in HDV.
I think that if I had not been watching it on such a big screen, it may not have been so obvious, and indeed, it did not seem to be the case on my computer screen.
Has anyone had a similar experience or maybe know if I am committing a schoolboy error somewhere !
At this early stage, it has almost put me off using iMovie or at the very least, only using it to edit very sparingly.
Cheers,
kroguk.
I have recently purchased an HV20 and was glad to see that there was already a forum to discuss this great camcorder.
My first impressions of the camera are very good and so far, it has exceeded my expectations.
Its first test footage (apart from a few minutes in the garden) was taken at last weekends MotoGP event at Donington Park. I was pleased to see that it handled the fast moving subjects very well and the slower footage was flawless.
At this stage I guess I should point out that I have played back the footage on a Panasonic 50" plasma (via HDMI) and it is simply crystal clear and highly detailed.
Okay, onto the thread topic ! I have imported the footage into iMovieHD on my Mac and have edited it very simply by adding some transitions between clips and also some titling. I also experimented with slowing some footage down. After finishing the edit and waiting three and a half hours for my Mac to send it back to my camera, I played back the footage to see what the results were like. For the most part they were fine. The slow-mo experiment failed...not sure why....might be an interlacing issue?!?.
However, the one thing that was very noticeable was a distinct drop in quality where transitions or titling had been added. It was almost as if the software had processed the frame affected by the transition at a lower resolution and when the frame went back to its unedited portion, it returned to its noticeably higher quality. It kinda' looked like the edited part was in DV whilst the rest was obviously still in HDV.
I think that if I had not been watching it on such a big screen, it may not have been so obvious, and indeed, it did not seem to be the case on my computer screen.
Has anyone had a similar experience or maybe know if I am committing a schoolboy error somewhere !
At this early stage, it has almost put me off using iMovie or at the very least, only using it to edit very sparingly.
Cheers,
kroguk.