PDA

View Full Version : FREE Footage/picture hosting on HV20.com



Mal
2007 March 24th, 20:45
Let me know if you have footage or pictures, and limited webspace. We can host it right here on this server.

Cheers.

Mal
2007 March 26th, 19:06
Up to 250MB files.

bustak
2007 March 27th, 00:29
^ :hv20-smilie77: REALLY!?!? What is the preferable file format?

Mal
2007 March 27th, 07:08
Well, QuickTime is probably best; H264 makes smaller files sizes, but really Sorenson 3 is more widely available.

Other options would be WMV, probably not quite as universal as Quicktime though.

apfx07
2007 March 29th, 12:32
I have some small m2t files that I would like to post of HD and 24p-Cine mode captures...Therefore, if bandwidth is sufficent for hosting.....then I say count me in :-)

Mal
2007 March 29th, 13:22
Let me set something up...

Mal
2007 March 30th, 08:18
(revised May 25th, 2007)

Step-by-step instruction for free movie & picture hosting on HV20.info:

- you can ftp to hv20.info; the folder will automatically be chosen for you, just use "hv20.info" (without quotation marks) as the location
- use "anonymous" as login and password; without quotation marks of course
- max file size is 250MB per file
- NO COPYRIGHTED MUSIC PLEASE; do NOT use copyrighted music for your clip; it's not allowed unless you have permission by the author & the label
- please only upload HV20 related material; I'll keep an eye out for unrelated items and remove them
- let me know it there's a problem
- use a free ftp program to upload, such as FileZilla on the PC: http://www.download.com/FileZilla/3000-2160_4-10634986.html?tag=lst-3-7
- you need to link to your file like this: http://hv20.info/yopu/yourfilename.extention (example: http://hv20.info/yopu/hello.gif )



...and before anyone askes:
Your Own Personal Upload :hv20-smilie72:

Michael Davis
2007 November 5th, 12:51
Well, QuickTime is probably best; H264 makes smaller files sizes, but really Sorenson 3 is more widely available.

Other options would be WMV, probably not quite as universal as Quicktime though.

I hate to split hairs, because while I prefer QuickTime, Windows Media Player (with WMV support) is standard in an install of Windows, and Windows is on, like, 90% of the world's desktop (not server) computers. So, I think, technically... WMV is actually the more "universal" option.

Rentakill
2007 December 3rd, 04:32
Thanks Mal.....:hv20-smilie03:

ArnsteinB
2008 February 10th, 19:02
I finally got some spare time to make some test shots with my 4 day old HV20.
It's all "Auto", and hand held. I use Pinnacle 11+, but couldn't fine any other way to make a full HD (1920x1080) than render it as a WMA-file (Windows Media). "Manual_D" says that 100 mB of "raw footage" will be around 28 secs. This file is 30 mB and 48 secs...
I don't know how to export/render true raw footage..I'm even not sure what that is...sorry, i have tons to learn...(which I have known all the time...), but that is the really fun part of this hobby. That, and all the DIY-possibilities! This movie (http://hv20.info/yopu/My_first_testshots_HV20.wmv)is a WMA 1080/50i, 1920x1080, 5 mbit/s, 25 FPS. Audio: WMA, 16 bit Stereo, 48 kHz). Will any of this cause problems for the NTSC-community? I understand that there are a difference in the height of a "normal TV" video; PAL has 576 pixels(?) height, and NTSC is 480. But full HD is 1920x1080 for both PAL and NTSC?
Hmm..there are so much I don't understand in this field..
P.s. I don't have limited space (I pay 1.50 USD per month for 1 gB). Just wanted to test this offer. If the video is of little interest, and you need the space for other films, just delete it.

cypherkin
2008 February 13th, 08:16
Well, QuickTime is probably best; H264 makes smaller files sizes, but really Sorenson 3 is more widely available.

Other options would be WMV, probably not quite as universal as Quicktime though.


Just out of curiosity, but what exactly is "Sorenson 3" ?? I am guessing its some sort of codec/encoding format by reading an article in Wikipedia - but according to the same article - it is no longer in use - as both quicktime and flash video use a different set of 'codecs' ??

Even though I might sound a little ignorant - isn't it better to have flash as the video - becasue alot more people can play it alot easier - for example how Vimeo and Youtube makes their videos. (also the inclusion of h.264 for flash by Adobe - makes the video alot better, no longer pixelated the video is very smooth - atleast in the tests that I have seen -> any comments on that?? )

Mal
2008 February 13th, 09:15
cypherkin, according to whom?

With new computers I might agree with you; but not everyone has a Windows XP or VISTA machine running the latest software.
There's plenty of people with old computers, with old codecs, and with crappy internet service out there.

Believe it or not, there's a good percentage still have a screen resolution of 800x600 for instance.

Mal
(not a fan of both vimeo or youtube...prefer a direct link to the video for downloading, not relying on a webrowser plug-in to view videos...)

netrate
2009 February 16th, 14:58
I tried to make a directory in the server (with my name as you suggested in the sticky) but it didn't seem to let me. Instead I put my user name first in the file name. Is that ok?

1
2009 February 16th, 16:05
I tried to make a directory in the server...
You won't be able to make a new directory/folder.

It all goes into the same one.

previdman
2009 February 16th, 16:24
So frustrated with Vimeo and YT, both.

HV20.com - Just keeps gettin' better and better.

Thanks Mal!

drapeama
2011 February 27th, 00:00
Doesn't work Mal. Just tried and it gave me a "530 - Login Incorrect" error.

Steve_Karl
2011 March 2nd, 07:58
http://www.sightsea.com/renders/hv20.jpg

http://www.sightsea.com/renders/hv202.jpg

lilysabrina
2011 April 8th, 02:31
Thanks Mal.....

drapeama
2012 September 12th, 14:46
Just tried. It works fine now. Thanks Mal!

drapeama
2012 September 25th, 05:01
...still get that Err404.